Ad is loading...
DEEP vs FDM
DEEP vs FDM Comparison
Open Charts DEEP vs FDM
Acquirers Deep Value ETF
Price$28.24
Change+$0.52 (+1.88%)
Volume$5.31K
Net Assets20.85M
First Trust Dow Jones Sel MicroCap ETF
Price$58.02
Change+$0.56 (+0.97%)
Volume$11.05K
Net Assets152.55M
DEEP vs FDM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEEP vs. FDM commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEEP is a Hold and FDM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDM has more net assets: 153M vs. DEEP (20.8M). FDM has a higher annual dividend yield than DEEP: FDM (-14.503) vs DEEP (-17.559). DEEP was incepted earlier than FDM: DEEP (11 years) vs FDM (20 years). FDM (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than DEEP (0.80). DEEP has a higher turnover FDM (72.00) vs FDM (72.00).
| DEEP | FDM | DEEP / FDM | |
| Gain YTD | -17.559 | -14.503 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 20.8M | 153M | 14% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.60 | 133% |
| Turnover | 118.00 | 72.00 | 164% |
| Yield | 2.78 | 2.06 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DEEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEEP has been loosely correlated with CCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEEP jumps, then CCS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEEP | 100% | +1.88% | ||
| CCS - DEEP | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| REPX - DEEP | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.71% | ||
| SHOO - DEEP | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| RM - DEEP | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| BRY - DEEP | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||
FDM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDM has been closely correlated with BFST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDM jumps, then BFST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDM | 100% | +0.98% | ||
| BFST - FDM | 80% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| BCML - FDM | 77% Closely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| FSBC - FDM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| SPFI - FDM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| AMAL - FDM | 75% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
More | ||||