Ad is loading...
DEEP vs IJS
DEEP vs IJS Comparison
Open Charts DEEP vs IJS
Acquirers Deep Value ETF
Price$30.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$124
Net Assets23.18M
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
Price$94.52
Change-$0.03 (-0.03%)
Volume$7.51K
Net Assets5.98B
DEEP vs IJS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEEP vs. IJS commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEEP is a Buy and IJS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IJS has more net assets: 5.98B vs. DEEP (23.2M). DEEP has a higher annual dividend yield than IJS: DEEP (-9.886) vs IJS (-12.630). DEEP was incepted earlier than IJS: DEEP (11 years) vs IJS (25 years). IJS (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than DEEP (0.80). DEEP has a higher turnover IJS (66.00) vs IJS (66.00).
| DEEP | IJS | DEEP / IJS | |
| Gain YTD | -9.886 | -12.630 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 23.2M | 5.98B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.18 | 444% |
| Turnover | 118.00 | 66.00 | 179% |
| Yield | 2.93 | 2.10 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DEEP | IJS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IJS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJS has been closely correlated with SBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJS jumps, then SBCF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IJS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJS | 100% | +2.32% | ||
| SBCF - IJS | 84% Closely correlated | +3.10% | ||
| UCB - IJS | 84% Closely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| SFBS - IJS | 84% Closely correlated | +2.57% | ||
| ABCB - IJS | 84% Closely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| SFNC - IJS | 83% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
More | ||||