Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWAX
DEMAX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWAX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$33.73
Change-$0.29 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.06B
American Funds New World R1
Price$90.51
Change-$0.10 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
DEMAX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. DEMAX (8.06B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: DEMAX (1.02) vs RNWAX (0.00). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) and DEMAX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWAX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.61 vs. RNWAX (17.90). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.50 vs. RNWAX (15.86).
| DEMAX | RNWAX | DEMAX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.66 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.66 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 66.815 | 22.925 | 291% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.06B | 74.1B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.61 | 17.90 | 350% |
| Returns for 3 years | 106.14 | 42.98 | 247% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.50 | 15.86 | 331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 183.82 | 82.16 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement