Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWBX
DEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$26.57
Change+$0.13 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.56B
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.22
Change+$0.87 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.99B
DEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69B vs. DEMAX (6.56B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: DEMAX (1.56) vs RNWBX (0.13). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) and DEMAX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWBX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.56 vs. RNWBX (10.04). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.99 vs. RNWBX (30.16).
| DEMAX | RNWBX | DEMAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.67 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.405 | 14.507 | 216% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.56B | 69B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.13 | 1,160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.56 | 10.04 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.42 | 32.68 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.99 | 30.16 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.88 | 60.47 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement