Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWBX
DEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$23.86
Change+$0.44 (+1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.94B
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.76
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
DEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. DEMAX (5.94B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: DEMAX (1.56) vs RNWBX (0.13). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) and DEMAX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWBX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.28 vs. RNWBX (6.60). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.05 vs. RNWBX (24.82).
| DEMAX | RNWBX | DEMAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.67 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.826 | 10.918 | 145% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.94B | 67.6B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.13 | 1,160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.28 | 6.60 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.50 | 21.12 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.05 | 24.82 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.38 | 54.72 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement