Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWBX
DEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$26.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.55B
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.83
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.07B
DEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. DEMAX (6.55B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: DEMAX (1.33) vs RNWBX (0.13). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) and DEMAX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWBX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.84 vs. RNWBX (8.48). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.51 vs. RNWBX (24.16).
| DEMAX | RNWBX | DEMAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.67 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.454 | 15.337 | 205% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.55B | 70.1B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.13 | 1,042% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.84 | 8.48 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.59 | 38.04 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.51 | 24.16 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.14 | 59.88 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers