Ad is loading...
DEMCX vs RNWAX
DEMCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWAX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$19.45
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.3B
American Funds New World R1
Price$75.27
Change+$0.20 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.88B
DEMCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 61.9B vs. DEMCX (5.3B). DEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: DEMCX (1.06) vs RNWAX (0.00). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWAX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.17 vs. RNWAX (-0.03). DEMCX (49.43) and RNWAX (47.87) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DEMCX | RNWAX | DEMCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.66 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.66 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.516 | 2.227 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.3B | 61.9B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.17 | -0.03 | -643% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.26 | 1.77 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.43 | 47.87 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.04 | 39.96 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...