Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWBX
DEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$23.70
Change-$0.12 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.37B
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.38
Change-$0.32 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
DEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. DEMCX (6.37B). DEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: DEMCX (0.86) vs RNWBX (0.13). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.05 vs. RNWBX (11.39). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.04 vs. RNWBX (17.80).
| DEMCX | RNWBX | DEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.67 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.67 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.065 | 17.444 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 71.8B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.13 | 663% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.05 | 11.39 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.21 | 36.75 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.04 | 17.80 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.42 | 84.76 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement