Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWFX
DEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWFX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$29.24
Change-$0.09 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.82B
American Funds New World R5
Price$96.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
DEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. DEMCX (7.82B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: RNWFX (0.97) vs DEMCX (0.74). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.53 vs. RNWFX (12.79). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.27 vs. RNWFX (30.85).
| DEMCX | RNWFX | DEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.62 | 350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.62 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 57.688 | 24.657 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.82B | 75.2B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.97 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.53 | 12.79 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.33 | 57.93 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.27 | 30.85 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.25 | 95.27 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers