Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAS vs GRPZ
DFAS vs GRPZ Comparison
Open Charts DFAS vs GRPZ
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
Price$67.55
Change-$0.10 (-0.15%)
Volume$338.97K
Net Assets11.31B
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF
Price$26.07
Change+$0.13 (+0.50%)
Volume$138
Net Assets2.6M
DFAS vs GRPZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAS vs. GRPZ commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAS is a Hold and GRPZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAS has more net assets: 11.3B vs. GRPZ (2.6M). DFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than GRPZ: DFAS (4.586) vs GRPZ (0.925). DFAS was incepted earlier than GRPZ: DFAS (27 years) vs GRPZ (2 years). DFAS (0.27) has a lower expense ratio than GRPZ (0.35). GRPZ has a higher turnover DFAS (8.00) vs DFAS (8.00).
| DFAS | GRPZ | DFAS / GRPZ | |
| Gain YTD | 4.586 | 0.925 | 496% |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 2.6M | 435,453% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.35 | 77% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 66.00 | 12% |
| Yield | 0.98 | 0.93 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAS | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 13 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||
GRPZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRPZ has been loosely correlated with WABC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRPZ jumps, then WABC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRPZ | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| WABC - GRPZ | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| FELE - GRPZ | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| AX - GRPZ | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| IOSP - GRPZ | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| CRK - GRPZ | 42% Loosely correlated | -4.12% | ||
More | ||||