DFAS | XJR | DFAS / XJR | |
Gain YTD | 5.747 | 2.901 | 198% |
Net Assets | 11.5B | 105M | 10,952% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.12 | 225% |
Turnover | 8.00 | 27.00 | 30% |
Yield | 0.98 | 1.75 | 56% |
Fund Existence | 27 years | 5 years | - |
DFAS | XJR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 6 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago83% | 2 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS | 100% | -1.19% | ||
UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.43% | ||
CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that XJR and BCC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XJR and BCC's prices will move in lockstep.