Ad is loading...
DFAT vs DGRS
DFAT vs DGRS Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs DGRS
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$57.61
Change-$0.49 (-0.84%)
Volume$212.7K
Net Assets11.22B
WisdomTree US SmallCap Qual Div Gr ETF
Price$52.31
Change-$0.59 (-1.12%)
Volume$22.08K
Net Assets482.92M
DFAT vs DGRS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. DGRS commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Buy and DGRS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 11.2B vs. DGRS (483M). DFAT has a higher annual dividend yield than DGRS: DFAT (3.503) vs DGRS (2.102). DFAT was incepted earlier than DGRS: DFAT (26 years) vs DGRS (12 years). DGRS has a higher turnover DFAT (3.00) vs DFAT (3.00).
| DFAT | DGRS | DFAT / DGRS | |
| Gain YTD | 3.503 | 2.102 | 167% |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 483M | 2,319% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 51.00 | 6% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 2.18 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | DGRS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 88% | 16 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 86% | 16 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 83% | 29 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 82% | 16 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | +3.85% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.67% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||
DGRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGRS has been closely correlated with IBOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DGRS jumps, then IBOC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DGRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DGRS | 100% | -1.12% | ||
| IBOC - DGRS | 82% Closely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| WSFS - DGRS | 81% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| KMT - DGRS | 79% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| WD - DGRS | 79% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| DLX - DGRS | 79% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
More | ||||