Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs ECML
DFAT vs ECML Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs ECML
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$56.08
Change+$0.18 (+0.32%)
Volume$308
Net Assets11.29B
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
Price$31.16
Change-$0.59 (-1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.98M
DFAT vs ECML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. ECML commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and ECML is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 11.3B vs. ECML (150M). DFAT has a higher annual dividend yield than ECML: DFAT (1.200) vs ECML (0.175). DFAT was incepted earlier than ECML: DFAT (27 years) vs ECML (2 years). DFAT (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than ECML (0.95). ECML has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | ECML | DFAT / ECML | |
| Gain YTD | 1.200 | 0.175 | 687% |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 150M | 7,533% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.95 | 29% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 30.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 1.00 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | ECML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | -1.60% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -2.69% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||
ECML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECML has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECML jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECML | 100% | N/A | ||
| BCC - ECML | 74% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| TEX - ECML | 71% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| CMC - ECML | 69% Closely correlated | -4.28% | ||
| OC - ECML | 68% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| AN - ECML | 67% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
More | ||||