Ad is loading...
DFAT vs ECML
DFAT vs ECML Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs ECML
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$46.31
Change-$2.31 (-4.75%)
Volume$917.4K
Net Assets9.53B
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
Price$29.06
Change+$2.01 (+7.43%)
Volume$971
Net Assets147.39M
DFAT vs ECML Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. ECML commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and ECML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 9.53B vs. ECML (147M). ECML has a higher annual dividend yield than DFAT: ECML (-8.322) vs DFAT (-16.546). DFAT was incepted earlier than ECML: DFAT (26 years) vs ECML (2 years). DFAT (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than ECML (0.95). ECML has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | ECML | DFAT / ECML | |
| Gain YTD | -16.546 | -8.322 | 199% |
| Net Assets | 9.53B | 147M | 6,480% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.95 | 29% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 23.00 | 39% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 1.01 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | -4.75% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -5.16% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.43% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.29% | ||
More | ||||
ECML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECML has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECML jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECML | 100% | N/A | ||
| BCC - ECML | 78% Closely correlated | -3.82% | ||
| TEX - ECML | 75% Closely correlated | -6.94% | ||
| OC - ECML | 75% Closely correlated | -4.84% | ||
| CMC - ECML | 73% Closely correlated | -4.45% | ||
| MHO - ECML | 73% Closely correlated | -3.73% | ||
More | ||||