Ad is loading...
DFAT vs ECML
DFAT vs ECML Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs ECML
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$56.08
Change-$1.51 (-2.62%)
Volume$2.71K
CapitalizationN/A
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
Price$33.04
Change-$0.47 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
DFAT vs ECML Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. ECML commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and ECML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 11.3B vs. ECML (180M). DFAT has a higher annual dividend yield than ECML: DFAT (11.542) vs ECML (7.178). DFAT was incepted earlier than ECML: DFAT (26 years) vs ECML (2 years). ECML has a higher turnover DFAT (3.00) vs DFAT (3.00).
| DFAT | ECML | DFAT / ECML | |
| Gain YTD | 11.542 | 7.178 | 161% |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 180M | 6,278% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 13.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 1.25 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | ECML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | -1.32% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
More | ||||
ECML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECML has been closely correlated with MHO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECML jumps, then MHO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECML | 100% | N/A | ||
| MHO - ECML | 80% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| TPH - ECML | 79% Closely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| TMHC - ECML | 79% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| KBH - ECML | 78% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| BCC - ECML | 78% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
More | ||||