Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs MDYV
DFAT vs MDYV Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs MDYV
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$52.82
Change+$0.68 (+1.30%)
Volume$243.14K
Net Assets10.27B
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
Price$77.97
Change+$0.86 (+1.12%)
Volume$50.81K
Net Assets2.32B
DFAT vs MDYV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. MDYV commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a StrongBuy and MDYV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 10.3B vs. MDYV (2.32B). MDYV has a higher annual dividend yield than DFAT: MDYV (-2.472) vs DFAT (-4.814). DFAT was incepted earlier than MDYV: DFAT (27 years) vs MDYV (20 years). MDYV (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than DFAT (0.28). MDYV has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | MDYV | DFAT / MDYV | |
| Gain YTD | -4.814 | -2.472 | 195% |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 2.32B | 444% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.15 | 187% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 41.00 | 22% |
| Yield | 1.51 | 1.92 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | MDYV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 81% | 23 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | +1.30% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | +3.12% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +7.04% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
More | ||||
MDYV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYV has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYV jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYV | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| AVNT - MDYV | 88% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| EQH - MDYV | 83% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| SSB - MDYV | 83% Closely correlated | +2.74% | ||
| HWC - MDYV | 83% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| JHG - MDYV | 83% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||