Ad is loading...
DFAT vs MDYV
DFAT vs MDYV Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs MDYV
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$57.37
Change+$0.25 (+0.44%)
Volume$173.63K
Net Assets11.08B
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
Price$83.03
Change+$0.29 (+0.35%)
Volume$285.23K
Net Assets2.68B
DFAT vs MDYV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. MDYV commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and MDYV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 11.1B vs. MDYV (2.68B). MDYV has a higher annual dividend yield than DFAT: MDYV (3.529) vs DFAT (3.072). DFAT was incepted earlier than MDYV: DFAT (26 years) vs MDYV (19 years). MDYV has a higher turnover DFAT (3.00) vs DFAT (3.00).
| DFAT | MDYV | DFAT / MDYV | |
| Gain YTD | 3.072 | 3.529 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 2.68B | 415% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 46.00 | 7% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 1.59 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | MDYV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | 13 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 20 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
More | ||||
MDYV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYV has been closely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYV jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYV | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| SSB - MDYV | 81% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| HOMB - MDYV | 81% Closely correlated | +3.26% | ||
| FNB - MDYV | 81% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| ASB - MDYV | 80% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| CUZ - MDYV | 79% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
More | ||||