Ad is loading...
DFAT vs XMVM
DFAT vs XMVM Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs XMVM
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$45.96
Change-$2.45 (-5.06%)
Volume$30.38K
Net Assets10.34B
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momt ETF
Price$47.92
Change-$2.19 (-4.37%)
Volume$2K
Net Assets251.96M
DFAT vs XMVM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. XMVM commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and XMVM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 10.3B vs. XMVM (252M). XMVM has a higher annual dividend yield than DFAT: XMVM (-8.917) vs DFAT (-12.761). DFAT was incepted earlier than XMVM: DFAT (26 years) vs XMVM (20 years). DFAT (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than XMVM (0.39). XMVM has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | XMVM | DFAT / XMVM | |
| Gain YTD | -12.761 | -8.917 | 143% |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 252M | 4,087% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.39 | 72% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 82.00 | 11% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 1.92 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | XMVM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | -7.72% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -10.86% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | -7.97% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | -11.23% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -16.84% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.61% | ||
More | ||||
XMVM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMVM has been closely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMVM jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMVM | 100% | -6.98% | ||
| SSB - XMVM | 85% Closely correlated | -10.61% | ||
| ZION - XMVM | 84% Closely correlated | -13.14% | ||
| COLB - XMVM | 82% Closely correlated | -13.14% | ||
| WAL - XMVM | 79% Closely correlated | -15.93% | ||
| TNL - XMVM | 76% Closely correlated | -10.88% | ||
More | ||||