Ad is loading...
DFFCX vs RPFGX
DFFCX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts DFFCX vs RPFGX
DFFCX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFCX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFCX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFCX (1.06B) and RPFGX (1.06B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RPFGX pays higher dividends than DFFCX: RPFGX (1.70) vs DFFCX (1.06). DFFCX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: DFFCX (27 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). DFFCX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.95 vs. DFFCX (33.83). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.69 vs. DFFCX (33.07).
| DFFCX | RPFGX | DFFCX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.129 | 4.182 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 1.06B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.70 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.83 | 35.95 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.02 | 22.08 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.07 | 45.69 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.63 | 94.59 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers