Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFCX vs RPFGX
DFFCX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts DFFCX vs RPFGX
DFFCX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFCX vs. RPFGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFCX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFCX (1.12B) and RPFGX (1.12B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RPFGX pays higher dividends than DFFCX: RPFGX (1.30) vs DFFCX (0.71). DFFCX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: DFFCX (28 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). DFFCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). DFFCX (2.00) and RPFGX (2.00) have comparable annual turnover. DFFCX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. DFFCX (10.62). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 89.59 vs. DFFCX (73.14).
| DFFCX | RPFGX | DFFCX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.94 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.94 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.069 | 17.917 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 1.12B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.30 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 12.37 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.11 | 60.08 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.14 | 89.59 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.68 | 101.51 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement