Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFGX vs WSGIX
DFFGX vs WSGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFGX vs. WSGIX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFGX is a Hold and WSGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.77B vs. WSGIX (210M). WSGIX pays higher dividends than DFFGX: WSGIX (4.45) vs DFFGX (4.17). DFFGX was incepted earlier than WSGIX: DFFGX (39 years) vs WSGIX (21 years). WSGIX (0.54) is less costly to investors than DFFGX (0.17). WSGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. DFFGX (37.00). DFFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSGIX: DFFGX (0) vs WSGIX (1000000). WSGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.52 vs. DFFGX (4.26). DFFGX return over 5 years is better than : 8.20 vs. WSGIX (7.33).
| DFFGX | WSGIX | DFFGX / WSGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.42 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.54 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.701 | 4.822 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 210M | 840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.17 | 4.45 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.26 | 5.52 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.22 | 15.84 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.20 | 7.33 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.51 | 18.59 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement