Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs FTMSX
DFFVX vs FTMSX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs FTMSX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$35.30
Change-$0.37 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.63B
FullerThaler Behvrl Mcr-Cp Eq Instl
Price$25.85
Change-$0.37 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.17M
DFFVX vs FTMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. FTMSX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and FTMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.6B vs. FTMSX (21.2M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than FTMSX: DFFVX (1.62) vs FTMSX (0.13). DFFVX was incepted earlier than FTMSX: DFFVX (25 years) vs FTMSX (7 years). FTMSX (1.69) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). FTMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTMSX: DFFVX (0) vs FTMSX (100000). FTMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. DFFVX (11.41). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 92.89 vs. FTMSX (40.09).
| DFFVX | FTMSX | DFFVX / FTMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.33 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.69 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.652 | -2.383 | -153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 21.2M | 64,151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 0.13 | 1,209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.41 | 12.82 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.68 | -7.59 | -299% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.89 | 40.09 | 232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement