Ad is loading...
DFFVX vs QBNAX
DFFVX vs QBNAX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs QBNAX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$30.36
Change+$0.58 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.69B
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Instl
Price$32.21
Change+$0.48 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.35M
DFFVX vs QBNAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. QBNAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and QBNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. QBNAX (84.3M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than QBNAX: DFFVX (1.63) vs QBNAX (1.11). DFFVX was incepted earlier than QBNAX: DFFVX (25 years) vs QBNAX (32 years). QBNAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). QBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than QBNAX: DFFVX (0) vs QBNAX (1000000). QBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.20 vs. DFFVX (-6.12). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 108.04 vs. QBNAX (68.58).
| DFFVX | QBNAX | DFFVX / QBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.08 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.21 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.027 | -7.059 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 84.3M | 13,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.11 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.12 | -4.20 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.65 | 4.80 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.04 | 68.58 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.47 | 19.31 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers