Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs QBNAX
DFFVX vs QBNAX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs QBNAX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$36.41
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.79B
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Instl
Price$36.24
Change-$0.10 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.27M
DFFVX vs QBNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. QBNAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and QBNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.8B vs. QBNAX (94.3M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than QBNAX: DFFVX (1.50) vs QBNAX (1.01). DFFVX was incepted earlier than QBNAX: DFFVX (26 years) vs QBNAX (33 years). QBNAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). QBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than QBNAX: DFFVX (0) vs QBNAX (1000000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.86 vs. QBNAX (3.42). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 107.11 vs. QBNAX (67.70).
| DFFVX | QBNAX | DFFVX / QBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.06 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.20 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.911 | 6.444 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.8B | 94.3M | 14,634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.01 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.86 | 3.42 | 288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.08 | 28.85 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.11 | 67.70 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.54 | 48.48 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement