Ad is loading...
DFFVX vs RSQCX
DFFVX vs RSQCX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs RSQCX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$31.62
Change+$0.05 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.26B
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Consult
Price$12.33
Change-$0.06 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets492.13M
DFFVX vs RSQCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. RSQCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and RSQCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. RSQCX (492M). RSQCX pays higher dividends than DFFVX: RSQCX (1.81) vs DFFVX (1.71). DFFVX was incepted earlier than RSQCX: DFFVX (25 years) vs RSQCX (22 years). RSQCX (2.35) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). DFFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 7.00 vs. RSQCX (5.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSQCX: DFFVX (0) vs RSQCX (2000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.42 vs. RSQCX (-20.32). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 105.73 vs. RSQCX (-5.31).
| DFFVX | RSQCX | DFFVX / RSQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 2.24 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 2.35 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.598 | -10.522 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.3B | 492M | 2,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.81 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.42 | -20.32 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.29 | -18.67 | -98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.73 | -5.31 | -1,991% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.65 | -40.06 | -114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers