Ad is loading...
DFFVX vs USBNX
DFFVX vs USBNX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs USBNX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$31.57
Change+$0.70 (+2.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.98B
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Ord
Price$26.37
Change+$0.53 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.76M
DFFVX vs USBNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. USBNX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and USBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. USBNX (86.8M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than USBNX: DFFVX (1.71) vs USBNX (0.39). DFFVX was incepted earlier than USBNX: DFFVX (25 years) vs USBNX (33 years). USBNX (1.45) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). USBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than USBNX: DFFVX (0) vs USBNX (2500). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.46 vs. USBNX (-3.57). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 105.40 vs. USBNX (51.91).
| DFFVX | USBNX | DFFVX / USBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.45 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.45 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.744 | -4.403 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 86.8M | 13,825% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 0.39 | 434% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.46 | -3.57 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.38 | 9.32 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.40 | 51.91 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.11 | 10.77 | 419% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...