Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFGBX vs FGBZX
DFGBX vs FGBZX Comparison
Open Charts DFGBX vs FGBZX
DFA Five-Year Global Fixed-Income I
Price$10.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.49B
Fidelity Advisor Global Credit A
Price$8.25
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.08M
DFGBX vs FGBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFGBX vs. FGBZX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFGBX is a Hold and FGBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFGBX has more cash in the bank: 9.49B vs. FGBZX (54.1M). DFGBX pays higher dividends than FGBZX: DFGBX (4.89) vs FGBZX (3.79). DFGBX was incepted earlier than FGBZX: DFGBX (35 years) vs FGBZX (13 years). FGBZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than DFGBX (0.21). FGBZX (57.00) and DFGBX (56.00) have comparable annual turnover. DFGBX (0) and FGBZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.58 vs. DFGBX (4.64). DFGBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.72 vs. FGBZX (-1.48).
| DFGBX | FGBZX | DFGBX / FGBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.21 | 0.75 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.21 | 0.88 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.185 | 6.329 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.49B | 54.1M | 17,545% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.89 | 3.79 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.64 | 5.58 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.05 | 18.94 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.72 | -1.48 | -386% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.95 | 18.43 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement