Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFRSX vs FICCX
DFRSX vs FICCX Comparison
Open Charts DFRSX vs FICCX
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company I
Price$18.74
Change+$0.30 (+1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.65M
Fidelity Advisor Canada I
Price$76.12
Change+$0.86 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets996.33M
DFRSX vs FICCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFRSX vs. FICCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFRSX is a StrongBuy and FICCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FICCX has more cash in the bank: 996M vs. DFRSX (155M). DFRSX pays higher dividends than FICCX: DFRSX (4.31) vs FICCX (1.39). DFRSX was incepted earlier than FICCX: DFRSX (32 years) vs FICCX (18 years). FICCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than DFRSX (0.51). DFRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FICCX (8.00). DFRSX (0) and FICCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FICCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. DFRSX (11.03). FICCX return over 5 years is better than : 79.46 vs. DFRSX (20.26).
| DFRSX | FICCX | DFRSX / FICCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.04 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.04 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.221 | 14.778 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 996M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.31 | 1.39 | 309% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.03 | 15.20 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.67 | 28.55 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.26 | 79.46 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.52 | 61.25 | 32% |