Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFRSX vs FICDX
DFRSX vs FICDX Comparison
Open Charts DFRSX vs FICDX
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company I
Price$18.74
Change+$0.30 (+1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.65M
DFRSX vs FICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFRSX vs. FICDX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFRSX is a StrongBuy and FICDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FICDX has more cash in the bank: 996M vs. DFRSX (155M). DFRSX pays higher dividends than FICDX: DFRSX (4.31) vs FICDX (1.16). DFRSX was incepted earlier than FICDX: DFRSX (32 years) vs FICDX (38 years). FICDX (1.03) is less costly to investors than DFRSX (0.51). DFRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FICDX (8.00). DFRSX (0) and FICDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.24 vs. DFRSX (11.03). FICDX return over 5 years is better than : 79.12 vs. DFRSX (20.26).
| DFRSX | FICDX | DFRSX / FICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.03 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.03 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.221 | 14.784 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 996M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.31 | 1.16 | 370% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.03 | 15.24 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.67 | 28.53 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.26 | 79.12 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.52 | 60.59 | 32% |