Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs QLSCX
DFSTX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs QLSCX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$30.29
Change+$0.33 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
DFSTX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. QLSCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. QLSCX (1.51B). DFSTX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: DFSTX (1.07) vs QLSCX (0.32). DFSTX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: DFSTX (34 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. DFSTX (6.00). DFSTX (0) and QLSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.36 vs. DFSTX (9.03). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 65.75 vs. QLSCX (60.30).
| DFSTX | QLSCX | DFSTX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.88 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.88 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.810 | 12.938 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17B | 1.51B | 1,129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.32 | 333% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.03 | 15.36 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.64 | 60.04 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.75 | 60.30 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement