Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs RPRCX
DFSTX vs RPRCX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs RPRCX
DFSTX vs RPRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. RPRCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and RPRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. RPRCX (1.07B). DFSTX pays higher dividends than RPRCX: DFSTX (1.05) vs RPRCX (0.00). DFSTX was incepted earlier than RPRCX: DFSTX (34 years) vs RPRCX (22 years). RPRCX (2.37) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). RPRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. DFSTX (6.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPRCX: DFSTX (0) vs RPRCX (2000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. RPRCX (-7.55). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 82.76 vs. RPRCX (-4.09).
| DFSTX | RPRCX | DFSTX / RPRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 2.24 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 2.37 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.142 | 2.334 | 263% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17B | 1.07B | 1,586% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | -7.55 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.71 | 9.32 | 480% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.76 | -4.09 | -2,023% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.60 | -44.15 | -198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement