Ad is loading...
DGAGX vs GFACX
DGAGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts DGAGX vs GFACX
BNY Mellon Appreciation Investor
Price$37.25
Change+$0.15 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$60.57
Change+$0.61 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
DGAGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DGAGX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGAGX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. DGAGX (2B). DGAGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: DGAGX (0.31) vs GFACX (0.00). DGAGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: DGAGX (41 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than DGAGX (0.89). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. DGAGX (12.56). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGAGX: GFACX (250) vs DGAGX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.11 vs. DGAGX (-11.56). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. DGAGX (40.62).
| DGAGX | GFACX | DGAGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.36 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.36 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.225 | -5.003 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 275B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.56 | -1.11 | 1,041% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.17 | 2.31 | -655% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.62 | 59.73 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.70 | 45.29 | -61% |