Ad is loading...
DGAGX vs GFAFX
DGAGX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts DGAGX vs GFAFX
BNY Mellon Appreciation Investor
Price$37.25
Change+$0.15 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$70.20
Change+$0.72 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
DGAGX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DGAGX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGAGX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. DGAGX (2B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than DGAGX: GFAFX (0.35) vs DGAGX (0.31). DGAGX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: DGAGX (41 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). DGAGX (0.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. DGAGX (12.56). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGAGX: GFAFX (250) vs DGAGX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.81 vs. DGAGX (-11.56). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 71.15 vs. DGAGX (40.62).
| DGAGX | GFAFX | DGAGX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.67 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.67 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.225 | -4.826 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 275B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.35 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.56 | 0.81 | -1,431% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.17 | 6.95 | -218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.62 | 71.15 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.70 | 61.39 | -45% |