DGDCF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
15.2M
GSHRF
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.02 (+10.53%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.85M
Ad is loading...

DGDCF vs GSHRF

Header iconDGDCF vs GSHRF Comparison
Open Charts DGDCF vs GSHRFBanner chart's image
Dynasty Gold
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$21.38K
Capitalization15.2M
Goldshore Resources
Price$0.21
Change+$0.02 (+10.53%)
Volume$44.3K
Capitalization20.85M
DGDCF vs GSHRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DGDCF vs. GSHRF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGDCF is a Hold and GSHRF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (DGDCF: $0.10 vs. GSHRF: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: DGDCF and GSHRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DGDCF: 106% vs. GSHRF: 120%
Market capitalization -- DGDCF: $15.2M vs. GSHRF: $20.85M
DGDCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.2M. GSHRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $20.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DGDCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSHRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DGDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GSHRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DGDCF and GSHRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DGDCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSHRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DGDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GSHRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DGDCF is a better buy in the short-term than GSHRF.

Price Growth

DGDCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.91% price change this week, while GSHRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSHRF($20.8M) has a higher market cap than DGDCF($15.2M). GSHRF YTD gains are higher at: 22.759 vs. DGDCF (8.163). DGDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -326.02K vs. GSHRF (-2.2M). GSHRF has more cash in the bank: 4M vs. DGDCF (955K). DGDCF (0) and GSHRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DGDCFGSHRFDGDCF / GSHRF
Capitalization15.2M20.8M73%
EBITDA-326.02K-2.2M15%
Gain YTD8.16322.75936%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash955K4M24%
Total DebtN/A345K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DGDCF vs GSHRF: Fundamental Ratings
DGDCF
GSHRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7684
SMR RATING
1..100
9195
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4130

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSHRF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (42). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (84). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (95). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

GSHRF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (49). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

GSHRF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (100). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DGDCFGSHRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RFNGX83.390.85
+1.03%
American Funds Fundamental Invs R6
BTIEX154.621.52
+0.99%
DWS Equity 500 Index S
JWWCX108.130.96
+0.90%
Janus Henderson Global Research C
VYCGX24.550.20
+0.82%
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 R6
AZBCX21.600.04
+0.19%
Virtus Small-Cap C

DGDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DGDCF and GSHRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DGDCF and GSHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DGDCF
1D Price
Change %
DGDCF100%
+4.24%
GSHRF - DGDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.18%
AEM - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
GOLD - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
AGI - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
ABNAF - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.13%
More

GSHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSHRF and SSVFF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSHRF and SSVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSHRF
1D Price
Change %
GSHRF100%
+7.18%
SSVFF - GSHRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
LGDTF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
CHPGF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
LOMLF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.32%
DTARF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-9.01%
More