DGDCF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
GSHRF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.02 (+12.50%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

DGDCF vs GSHRF

Header iconDGDCF vs GSHRF Comparison
Open Charts DGDCF vs GSHRFBanner chart's image
Dynasty Gold
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$5.8K
CapitalizationN/A
Goldshore Resources
Price$0.18
Change+$0.02 (+12.50%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
DGDCF vs GSHRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DGDCF vs. GSHRF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGDCF is a Hold and GSHRF is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (DGDCF: $0.09 vs. GSHRF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: DGDCF and GSHRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DGDCF: 44% vs. GSHRF: 2%
Market capitalization -- DGDCF: $15.2M vs. GSHRF: $20.85M
DGDCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.2M. GSHRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $20.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DGDCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSHRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DGDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GSHRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSHRF is a better buy in the long-term than DGDCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DGDCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSHRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DGDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSHRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DGDCF and GSHRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DGDCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +13.33% price change this week, while GSHRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSHRF($20.8M) has a higher market cap than DGDCF($15.2M). GSHRF YTD gains are higher at: 89.249 vs. DGDCF (-31.357). DGDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -326.02K vs. GSHRF (-2.2M). GSHRF has more cash in the bank: 4M vs. DGDCF (955K). DGDCF (0) and GSHRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DGDCFGSHRFDGDCF / GSHRF
Capitalization15.2M20.8M73%
EBITDA-326.02K-2.2M15%
Gain YTD-31.35789.249-35%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash955K4M24%
Total DebtN/A345K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DGDCF vs GSHRF: Fundamental Ratings
DGDCF
GSHRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2364
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7789
SMR RATING
1..100
9194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9530

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSHRF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (41). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (89). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (94). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

GSHRF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (90). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

GSHRF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (100). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DGDCFGSHRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USDNZD1.73N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - New Zealand Dollar
HKDGBP0.10N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - United Kingdom Pound
PGVFX32.20-0.24
-0.74%
Polaris Global Value
JVSAX16.23-0.23
-1.40%
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value A
LOVLX34.56-3.37
-8.89%
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F3

DGDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DGDCF and GSHRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DGDCF and GSHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DGDCF
1D Price
Change %
DGDCF100%
+28.13%
GSHRF - DGDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
AEM - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
GOLD - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
AGI - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
ABNAF - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GSHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSHRF and SSVFF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSHRF and SSVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSHRF
1D Price
Change %
GSHRF100%
-2.30%
SSVFF - GSHRF
29%
Poorly correlated
+9.77%
LGDTF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
CHPGF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-6.70%
LOMLF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+7.60%
DTARF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
More