Advertisement
DGICA vs PLMR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGICA is a Buy and PLMR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DGICA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePLMR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- DGICA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PLMR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DGICA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLMR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DGICA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- PLMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
DGICA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -5.48% price change this week, while PLMR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -8.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
DGICA is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
PLMR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.45% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| DGICA | PLMR | DGICA / PLMR | |
| Capitalization | 468M | 2.09B | 22% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.691 | 27.862 | 74% |
| P/E Ratio | 99.14 | 26.26 | 378% |
| Revenue | 927M | 376M | 247% |
| Total Cash | 361M | 695M | 52% |
| Total Debt | 35M | 52.6M | 67% |
DGICA | PLMR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DGICA's Valuation (25) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLMR (94) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that DGICA’s stock grew significantly faster than PLMR’s over the last 12 months.
DGICA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLMR (52) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that DGICA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLMR’s over the last 12 months.
PLMR's SMR Rating (45) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as DGICA (60) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that PLMR’s stock grew similarly to DGICA’s over the last 12 months.
DGICA's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as PLMR (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that DGICA’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.
PLMR's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DGICA (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that PLMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than DGICA’s over the last 12 months.
| DGICA | PLMR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 54% | 13 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
DGICA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGICA has been loosely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DGICA jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DGICA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DGICA | 100% | -1.93% | ||
| CNA - DGICA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| SAFT - DGICA | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| CINF - DGICA | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| THG - DGICA | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| HMN - DGICA | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
More | ||||
PLMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMR has been loosely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLMR jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLMR | 100% | -2.59% | ||
| SKWD - PLMR | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| RLI - PLMR | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| L - PLMR | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| CINF - PLMR | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| THG - PLMR | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||