Advertisement
L vs PLMR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Hold and PLMR is a Hold.
L | PLMR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
L's Valuation (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PLMR (82). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.
L's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLMR (70). This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLMR’s over the last 12 months.
PLMR's SMR Rating (45) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (98). This means that PLMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.
L's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PLMR (58). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.
PLMR's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (61). This means that PLMR’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.
| L | PLMR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 38% | 5 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 79% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
L’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PLMR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- L’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PLMR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLMR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PLMR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while PLMR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
L is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
PLMR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.39% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BTCL | 20.54 | 0.53 | +2.63% |
| T-Rex 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | |||
| FNCL | 75.87 | 0.15 | +0.20% |
| Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) | |||
| IVVB | 35.40 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| iShares Large Cap Deep Quarterly Laddered ETF (IVVB) | |||
| PMAP | 27.62 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP) | |||
| CCNR | 38.39 | -0.19 | -0.48% |
| ALPS CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) | |||
L and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.
PLMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMR has been closely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLMR jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLMR | 100% | +2.14% | ||
| SKWD - PLMR | 66% Closely correlated | +3.75% | ||
| RLI - PLMR | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| CNA - PLMR | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| L - PLMR | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| HMN - PLMR | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||