Advertisement
DGICA vs SAFT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGICA is a Hold and SAFT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DGICA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DGICA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DGICA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DGICA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SAFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DGICA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +2.72% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +3.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
DGICA is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
SAFT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.95% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| DGICA | SAFT | DGICA / SAFT | |
| Capitalization | 624M | 1.09B | 57% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.983 | -8.846 | -181% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.33 | 12.98 | 56% |
| Revenue | 994M | 1.14B | 87% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 613M | - |
| Total Debt | 35M | 44.7M | 78% |
DGICA | SAFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 74 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 44 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAFT's Valuation (17) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as DGICA (22) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to DGICA’s over the last 12 months.
DGICA's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that DGICA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
DGICA's SMR Rating (60) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (74) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that DGICA’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
DGICA's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that DGICA’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as DGICA (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to DGICA’s over the last 12 months.
| DGICA | SAFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 24 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
DGICA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGICA has been loosely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DGICA jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DGICA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DGICA | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| CNA - DGICA | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| THG - DGICA | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| SAFT - DGICA | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| ORI - DGICA | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| HIG - DGICA | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
More | ||||
SAFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been closely correlated with UFCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then UFCS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | 100% | -1.32% | ||
| UFCS - SAFT | 70% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| CNA - SAFT | 68% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| HMN - SAFT | 67% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| L - SAFT | 66% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| CINF - SAFT | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
More | ||||