DGNOF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
23.71M
EBYH
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DGNOF vs EBYH

Header iconDGNOF vs EBYH Comparison
Open Charts DGNOF vs EBYHBanner chart's image
Diagnos
Price$0.14
Change-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Volume$22.01K
Capitalization23.71M
E-Buy Home
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.78M
DGNOF vs EBYH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DGNOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EBYH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DGNOF vs. EBYH commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGNOF is a Hold and EBYH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (DGNOF: $0.14 vs. EBYH: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: DGNOF and EBYH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DGNOF: 54% vs. EBYH: 45%
Market capitalization -- DGNOF: $23.71M vs. EBYH: $1.78M
DGNOF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $23.71M. EBYH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DGNOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEBYH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DGNOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EBYH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EBYH is a better buy in the long-term than DGNOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DGNOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EBYH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DGNOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • EBYH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DGNOF is a better buy in the short-term than EBYH.

Price Growth

DGNOF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.57% price change this week, while EBYH (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DGNOF($23.7M) has a higher market cap than EBYH($1.78M). EBYH YTD gains are higher at: -6.130 vs. DGNOF (-25.641).
DGNOFEBYHDGNOF / EBYH
Capitalization23.7M1.78M1,328%
EBITDA-2.17MN/A-
Gain YTD-25.641-6.130418%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue570KN/A-
Total Cash663KN/A-
Total Debt2.35MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DGNOF vs EBYH: Fundamental Ratings
DGNOF
EBYH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9391
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EBYH's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DGNOF (90). This means that EBYH’s stock grew somewhat faster than DGNOF’s over the last 12 months.

EBYH's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as DGNOF (93). This means that EBYH’s stock grew similarly to DGNOF’s over the last 12 months.

EBYH's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DGNOF (100). This means that EBYH’s stock grew similarly to DGNOF’s over the last 12 months.

EBYH's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DGNOF (87). This means that EBYH’s stock grew somewhat faster than DGNOF’s over the last 12 months.

EBYH's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DGNOF (100). This means that EBYH’s stock grew similarly to DGNOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DGNOFEBYH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DGNOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EBYH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SXOOF0.04N/A
+6.31%
St Georges Eco Mng Corp.
JARLF47.13N/A
N/A
Jardine Matheson Holdings Ltd.
NRWRF1.03N/A
N/A
Newriver Reit Plc
ATMTF0.04N/A
N/A
Andrada Mining Limited
NRKBF81.01N/A
N/A
NKT A/S

DGNOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DGNOF and KNAMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DGNOF and KNAMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DGNOF
1D Price
Change %
DGNOF100%
-5.78%
KNAMF - DGNOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEXOY - DGNOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
NEXOF - DGNOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EBYH - DGNOF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFMD - DGNOF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.33%
More

EBYH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EBYH and FBSFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EBYH and FBSFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBYH
1D Price
Change %
EBYH100%
N/A
FBSFF - EBYH
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRT - EBYH
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVWD - EBYH
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DGNOF - EBYH
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.78%
DNACF - EBYH
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More