DGS | EEM | DGS / EEM | |
Gain YTD | 20.628 | 26.174 | 79% |
Net Assets | 1.67B | 19.6B | 9% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.72 | 81% |
Turnover | 34.00 | 13.00 | 262% |
Yield | 2.65 | 2.37 | 112% |
Fund Existence | 18 years | 22 years | - |
DGS | EEM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago79% | 12 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGS has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DGS jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EEM | 100% | -0.06% | ||
BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -2.92% | ||
BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | +4.09% | ||
BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
More |