DGS | EEM | DGS / EEM | |
Gain YTD | -1.958 | 2.750 | -71% |
Net Assets | 1.56B | 16.7B | 9% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.72 | 81% |
Turnover | 51.00 | 13.00 | 392% |
Yield | 3.46 | 2.33 | 148% |
Fund Existence | 17 years | 22 years | - |
DGS | EEM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago78% | 5 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGS has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DGS jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EEM | 100% | -2.12% | ||
BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +2.69% | ||
BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
More |