DGS | EEM | DGS / EEM | |
Gain YTD | 2.126 | 7.365 | 29% |
Net Assets | 1.69B | 16.6B | 10% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 53.00 | 15.00 | 353% |
Yield | 4.32 | 2.57 | 168% |
Fund Existence | 17 years | 22 years | - |
DGS | EEM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 3 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 3 days ago89% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago85% | 5 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago79% | 20 days ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGS has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DGS jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EEM | 100% | -0.29% | ||
BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | +5.72% | ||
JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | +3.21% | ||
BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | +1.82% | ||
More |