DGS | IEMG | DGS / IEMG | |
Gain YTD | 3.113 | 8.093 | 38% |
Net Assets | 1.97B | 80.5B | 2% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 53.00 | 21.00 | 252% |
Yield | 4.32 | 2.83 | 153% |
Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
DGS | IEMG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago80% | 2 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGS has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DGS jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEMG has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEMG jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG | 100% | -0.24% | ||
BABA - IEMG | 75% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
JD - IEMG | 69% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
BILI - IEMG | 68% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
BIDU - IEMG | 66% Loosely correlated | -5.90% | ||
BZ - IEMG | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.87% | ||
More |