DGT | GCOW | DGT / GCOW | |
Gain YTD | 14.253 | 14.390 | 99% |
Net Assets | 395M | 2.35B | 17% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.60 | 83% |
Turnover | 12.00 | 49.00 | 24% |
Yield | 2.51 | 2.78 | 90% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
DGT | GCOW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago85% | 13 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 5 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGT has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DGT jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCOW has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GCOW jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW | 100% | -1.16% | ||
SHEL - GCOW | 70% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
BHP - GCOW | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
KMI - GCOW | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
BN - GCOW | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.57% | ||
TS - GCOW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
More |