Ad is loading...
DHLRX vs RMFCX
DHLRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts DHLRX vs RMFCX
Diamond Hill Large Cap I
Price$31.23
Change+$2.12 (+7.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.42B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.56
Change+$3.33 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
DHLRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DHLRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DHLRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. DHLRX (8.42B). DHLRX (1.37) and RMFCX (1.34) have matching dividends . DHLRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: DHLRX (20 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than DHLRX (0.67). DHLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than DHLRX: RMFCX (250) vs DHLRX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.43 vs. DHLRX (-15.12). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. DHLRX (33.93).
| DHLRX | RMFCX | DHLRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.876 | -7.697 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.42B | 98.3B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.34 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.12 | -4.43 | 341% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.95 | -0.65 | 1,838% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.93 | 45.42 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.91 | 46.29 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...