Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIAMX vs HHCZX
DIAMX vs HHCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIAMX vs. HHCZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIAMX is a Hold and HHCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIAMX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. HHCZX (89.6M). DIAMX pays higher dividends than HHCZX: DIAMX (1.83) vs HHCZX (0.49). DIAMX was incepted earlier than HHCZX: DIAMX (25 years) vs HHCZX (18 years). HHCZX (3.07) is less costly to investors than DIAMX (1.75). HHCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 397.00 vs. DIAMX (46.00). DIAMX (2500) and HHCZX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HHCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. DIAMX (6.86). DIAMX return over 5 years is better than : 23.12 vs. HHCZX (1.62).
| DIAMX | HHCZX | DIAMX / HHCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.38 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 3.07 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.602 | 9.257 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 89.6M | 2,511% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 0.49 | 373% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 9.20 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.89 | 23.35 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.12 | 1.62 | 1,426% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.58 | 30.08 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement