Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIAMX vs NLSCX
DIAMX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts DIAMX vs NLSCX
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$28.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.57
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.58B
DIAMX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIAMX vs. NLSCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIAMX is a StrongBuy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.58B vs. DIAMX (1.94B). DIAMX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: DIAMX (1.90) vs NLSCX (0.00). DIAMX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: DIAMX (25 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than DIAMX (1.75). NLSCX (48.00) and DIAMX (46.00) have comparable annual turnover. NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than DIAMX: NLSCX (1000) vs DIAMX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. DIAMX (4.50). DIAMX return over 5 years is better than : 25.97 vs. NLSCX (21.64).
| DIAMX | NLSCX | DIAMX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.544 | 5.144 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 7.58B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.50 | 10.52 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.86 | 13.21 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.97 | 21.64 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.25 | 37.87 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement