Ad is loading...
DIAMX vs NLSCX
DIAMX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts DIAMX vs NLSCX
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$26.30
Change+$0.30 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.72
Change+$0.16 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
DIAMX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIAMX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIAMX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. DIAMX (1.93B). DIAMX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: DIAMX (2.02) vs NLSCX (0.00). DIAMX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: DIAMX (25 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than DIAMX (1.75). NLSCX (48.00) and DIAMX (46.00) have comparable annual turnover. NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than DIAMX: NLSCX (1000) vs DIAMX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.28 vs. DIAMX (-6.75). DIAMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.33 vs. NLSCX (23.56).
| DIAMX | NLSCX | DIAMX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.188 | -0.735 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 7.13B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.75 | 4.28 | -158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.45 | 7.87 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.33 | 23.56 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.69 | 27.43 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...