Ad is loading...
DIDIY
Price
$4.77
Change
+$0.07 (+1.49%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
LGZDF
Price
$8.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

DIDIY vs LGZDF

Header iconDIDIY vs LGZDF Comparison
Open Charts DIDIY vs LGZDFBanner chart's image
DiDi Global
Price$4.77
Change+$0.07 (+1.49%)
Volume$2.09M
CapitalizationN/A
Logizard
Price$8.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$203
CapitalizationN/A
DIDIY vs LGZDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DIDIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIDIY vs. LGZDF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIDIY is a Sell and LGZDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (DIDIY: $4.77 vs. LGZDF: $8.65)
Brand notoriety: DIDIY and LGZDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIDIY: 20% vs. LGZDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- DIDIY: $18.02B vs. LGZDF: $21.94M
DIDIY [@Packaged Software] is valued at $18.02B. LGZDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $21.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIDIY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLGZDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DIDIY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LGZDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGZDF is a better buy in the long-term than DIDIY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIDIY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DIDIY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

DIDIY (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.85% price change this week, while LGZDF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIDIY($18B) has a higher market cap than LGZDF($21.9M). LGZDF YTD gains are higher at: 31.061 vs. DIDIY (20.759). LGZDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 327M vs. DIDIY (-42.85B). DIDIY has more cash in the bank: 56.8B vs. LGZDF (1.22B). LGZDF has less debt than DIDIY: LGZDF (1.63M) vs DIDIY (9.69B). DIDIY has higher revenues than LGZDF: DIDIY (174B) vs LGZDF (1.82B).
DIDIYLGZDFDIDIY / LGZDF
Capitalization18B21.9M82,192%
EBITDA-42.85B327M-13,103%
Gain YTD20.75931.06167%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue174B1.82B9,587%
Total Cash56.8B1.22B4,644%
Total Debt9.69B1.63M595,270%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DIDIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DIDIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLTB49.760.02
+0.04%
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
ICAP27.39-0.05
-0.18%
InfraCap Equity Income ETF
IEO97.96-0.68
-0.69%
iShares US Oil & Gas Explor & Prod ETF
MOTO42.17-0.49
-1.15%
SmartETFs Smart Trans & Tch ETF
IGM98.57-2.49
-2.46%
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF

DIDIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIDIY has been loosely correlated with YMM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIDIY jumps, then YMM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIDIY
1D Price
Change %
DIDIY100%
+1.49%
YMM - DIDIY
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
BILI - DIDIY
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
KC - DIDIY
30%
Poorly correlated
+8.60%
TUYA - DIDIY
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
YALA - DIDIY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
More

LGZDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGZDF and KSFTF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGZDF and KSFTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGZDF
1D Price
Change %
LGZDF100%
N/A
KSFTF - LGZDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNDO - LGZDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
HUBC - LGZDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.12%
MRT - LGZDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIDIY - LGZDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
More