Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIFAX vs HBLSX
DIFAX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts DIFAX vs HBLSX
MFS Diversified Income A
Price$12.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.9B
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.89B
DIFAX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIFAX vs. HBLSX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIFAX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. DIFAX (1.9B). DIFAX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: DIFAX (5.06) vs HBLSX (3.18). DIFAX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: DIFAX (19 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). DIFAX (0.96) and HBLSX (0.96) have similar cost to investors . HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. DIFAX (48.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than DIFAX: HBLSX (0) vs DIFAX (1000). DIFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.47 vs. HBLSX (3.31). DIFAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.09 vs. HBLSX (16.30).
| DIFAX | HBLSX | DIFAX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.96 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.96 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.848 | 9.028 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 11.9B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.06 | 3.18 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 3.31 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.45 | 24.78 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.09 | 16.30 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.35 | 45.99 | 101% |