Ad is loading...
DIHP vs QINT
DIHP vs QINT Comparison
Open Charts DIHP vs QINT
Dimensional International High Pbly ETF
Price$26.59
Change-$0.46 (-1.70%)
Volume$594.39K
Net Assets3.55B
American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF
Price$50.97
Change-$1.12 (-2.15%)
Volume$22.57K
Net Assets236.63M
DIHP vs QINT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIHP vs. QINT commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIHP is a Hold and QINT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIHP has more net assets: 3.55B vs. QINT (237M). QINT has a higher annual dividend yield than DIHP: QINT (6.565) vs DIHP (5.702). DIHP was incepted earlier than QINT: DIHP (3 years) vs QINT (7 years). DIHP (0.29) has a lower expense ratio than QINT (0.39). QINT has a higher turnover DIHP (17.00) vs DIHP (17.00).
| DIHP | QINT | DIHP / QINT | |
| Gain YTD | 5.702 | 6.565 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 3.55B | 237M | 1,498% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.39 | 74% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 78.00 | 22% |
| Yield | 2.27 | 3.23 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DIHP | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DIHP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIHP has been closely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DIHP jumps, then RY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DIHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIHP | 100% | -1.68% | ||
| RY - DIHP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| BHP - DIHP | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| MFC - DIHP | 65% Loosely correlated | -5.32% | ||
| ASML - DIHP | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.84% | ||
| STM - DIHP | 62% Loosely correlated | -10.86% | ||
More | ||||
QINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QINT has been closely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QINT jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QINT | 100% | -2.15% | ||
| SLF - QINT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| BN - QINT | 70% Closely correlated | -7.41% | ||
| BMO - QINT | 68% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| STM - QINT | 67% Closely correlated | -10.86% | ||
| MFC - QINT | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.32% | ||
More | ||||