DIISF
Price
$2.44
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
IAFNF
Price
$83.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Ad is loading...

DIISF vs IAFNF

Header iconDIISF vs IAFNF Comparison
Open Charts DIISF vs IAFNFBanner chart's image
Direct Line Insurance Group
Price$2.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.34K
CapitalizationN/A
IA FINL
Price$83.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$17.8K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
DIISF vs IAFNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
DIISF vs. IAFNF commentary
Oct 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIISF is a Hold and IAFNF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 23, 2024
Stock price -- (DIISF: $2.44 vs. IAFNF: $84.72)
Brand notoriety: DIISF and IAFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIISF: 100% vs. IAFNF: 3%
Market capitalization -- DIISF: $2.54B vs. IAFNF: $7.14B
DIISF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $2.54B. IAFNF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $7.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIISF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIAFNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DIISF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IAFNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IAFNF is a better buy in the long-term than DIISF.

Price Growth

DIISF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IAFNF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-1.24% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IAFNF($7.14B) has a higher market cap than DIISF($2.54B). DIISF has higher P/E ratio than IAFNF: DIISF (9.27) vs IAFNF (8.68). IAFNF YTD gains are higher at: 22.790 vs. DIISF (6.087). DIISF has more cash in the bank: 4.15B vs. IAFNF (1.95B). DIISF has less debt than IAFNF: DIISF (405M) vs IAFNF (1.5B). IAFNF has higher revenues than DIISF: IAFNF (12.9B) vs DIISF (3.15B).
DIISFIAFNFDIISF / IAFNF
Capitalization2.54B7.14B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.08722.79027%
P/E Ratio9.278.68107%
Revenue3.15B12.9B24%
Total Cash4.15B1.95B213%
Total Debt405M1.5B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIISF: Fundamental Ratings
DIISF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL235.860.86
+0.37%
Apple
BTC.X67361.410000-6.445312
-0.01%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY583.32-1.27
-0.22%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA217.97-2.73
-1.24%
Tesla
GME20.93-0.29
-1.37%
GameStop Corp

DIISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DIISF and DIISY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DIISF and DIISY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIISF
1D Price
Change %
DIISF100%
N/A
DIISY - DIISF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXAHY - DIISF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
AXAHF - DIISF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIVSY - DIISF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAFNF - DIISF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
More

IAFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IAFNF and AXAHY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAFNF and AXAHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAFNF
1D Price
Change %
IAFNF100%
-0.88%
AXAHY - IAFNF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
BBSEY - IAFNF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
AXAHF - IAFNF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPFRF - IAFNF
1%
Poorly correlated
-16.43%
DIISF - IAFNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More