DIISF
Price
$4.17
Change
+$0.46 (+12.40%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
2.54B
IAFNF
Price
$106.68
Change
-$1.48 (-1.37%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
7.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIISF vs IAFNF

Header iconDIISF vs IAFNF Comparison
Open Charts DIISF vs IAFNFBanner chart's image
Direct Line Insurance Group
Price$4.17
Change+$0.46 (+12.40%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization2.54B
IA FINL
Price$106.68
Change-$1.48 (-1.37%)
Volume$205
Capitalization7.14B
DIISF vs IAFNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DIISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IAFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIISF vs. IAFNF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIISF is a Buy and IAFNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (DIISF: $4.17 vs. IAFNF: $106.68)
Brand notoriety: DIISF and IAFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIISF: 909% vs. IAFNF: 76%
Market capitalization -- DIISF: $2.54B vs. IAFNF: $7.14B
DIISF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $2.54B. IAFNF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $7.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIISF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIAFNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIISF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IAFNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IAFNF is a better buy in the long-term than DIISF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIISF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IAFNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIISF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • IAFNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DIISF is a better buy in the short-term than IAFNF.

Price Growth

DIISF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +12.40% price change this week, while IAFNF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -0.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.09% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IAFNF($7.14B) has a higher market cap than DIISF($2.54B). DIISF has higher P/E ratio than IAFNF: DIISF (9.27) vs IAFNF (8.68). DIISF YTD gains are higher at: 34.951 vs. IAFNF (15.442). DIISF has more cash in the bank: 4.15B vs. IAFNF (1.95B). DIISF has less debt than IAFNF: DIISF (405M) vs IAFNF (1.5B). IAFNF has higher revenues than DIISF: IAFNF (12.9B) vs DIISF (3.15B).
DIISFIAFNFDIISF / IAFNF
Capitalization2.54B7.14B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.95115.442226%
P/E Ratio9.278.68107%
Revenue3.15B12.9B24%
Total Cash4.15B1.95B213%
Total Debt405M1.5B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIISF: Fundamental Ratings
DIISF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
49
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DIISFIAFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IAFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETCGX46.31N/A
N/A
Eventide Gilead C
IAFMX18.90N/A
N/A
F/m Investments Large Cap Focused Inv
IRLCX42.49-0.33
-0.77%
Voya Russell Large Cap Index Port S
TROSX14.71-0.17
-1.14%
T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock
LEAIX13.82-0.22
-1.57%
Lazard Emerging Markets Eq Advtg Instl

DIISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DIISF and DIISY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DIISF and DIISY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIISF
1D Price
Change %
DIISF100%
N/A
DIISY - DIISF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXAHY - DIISF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
AXAHF - DIISF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIVSY - DIISF
0%
Poorly correlated
+19.80%
IAFNF - DIISF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
More

IAFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IAFNF and BBSEY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAFNF and BBSEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAFNF
1D Price
Change %
IAFNF100%
-1.37%
BBSEY - IAFNF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
AXAHY - IAFNF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
AXAHF - IAFNF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPFRF - IAFNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIISF - IAFNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More