DINO
Price
$115.63
Change
+$1.03 (+0.90%)
Updated
Oct 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.88B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VLO
Price
$424.06
Change
+$4.83 (+1.15%)
Updated
Oct 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
112.17B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DINO vs VLO

DINO vs VLO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Valero Energy (VLO) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Shared sector tailwind: Both DINO and VLO are independent refiners benefiting from tight global refining capacity, low product inventories, and elevated crack spreads (the margin between crude oil costs and refined fuel prices).
  • Scale differs sharply: Valero operates roughly 3.0 million barrels per day of throughput across 14 refineries, while HF Sinclair runs about 678,000 barrels per day across seven refineries.
  • Both delivered strong quarters: In recent results, each company reported a sharp year-over-year jump in earnings, driven by higher refining margins and improved utilization.
  • Strong relative performance: Both stocks have more than doubled over the trailing twelve months, with the pair among the strongest performers in the oil refining and marketing industry.
  • Different catalysts: HF Sinclair is pursuing a separation of its Lubricants & Specialties segment, while Valero leans on its Gulf Coast scale, renewable diesel, and ethanol operations.

Introduction

Investors screening the energy sector frequently compare independent refiners because these companies share exposure to the same macro forces — crude prices, product demand, and crack spreads — yet differ meaningfully in scale, geography, and diversification. DINO (HF Sinclair Corporation) and VLO (Valero Energy Corporation) offer a useful study in that contrast. This stock comparison is especially relevant for traders and investors seeking to understand relative performance, market positioning, and which name may be better suited to current conditions. Both have rallied alongside a supportive refining environment, making the choice between them less about direction and more about structure, catalysts, and risk profile.

DINO Overview and Recent Performance

HF Sinclair Corporation is a diversified downstream energy company operating across five segments: Refining, Renewables, Marketing, Lubricants & Specialties, and Midstream. Its seven complex refineries, concentrated in the Mid-Continent, Southwest, Rocky Mountains, and Pacific Northwest, have combined processing capacity of roughly 678,000 barrels per day. In its most recent quarterly report, the company posted adjusted earnings of $5.31 per share — up more than 200% year over year — on revenue of about $10.39 billion, as higher margins, throughput, and refinery utilization lifted results across regions.

Recent market activity has been notably strong. The stock has gained well over 100% in the past year and, in recent weeks, reached a new 52-week high amid a multi-day winning streak that added billions to its market value. Sentiment has been supported by tight refining capacity, management commentary pointing to a margin environment that could persist into 2027, a 5% dividend increase, and plans to pursue a tax-efficient separation of the Lubricants & Specialties business over the next 12 to 18 months.

VLO Overview and Recent Performance

Valero Energy Corporation is one of the world's largest independent refiners, operating 14 petroleum refineries in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom with combined throughput capacity of approximately 3.0 million barrels per day. Its footprint is weighted toward the Gulf Coast, which provides access to discounted heavy crude grades and diverse feedstocks. Valero also owns 12 ethanol plants and is a joint-venture member in Diamond Green Diesel, adding renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) exposure.

The company's recent results were also strong. Adjusted earnings reached $12.54 per share in its latest quarter, with revenue rising roughly 49% year over year as refining margins per barrel nearly doubled. Valero returned about $2.6 billion to shareholders in the period and raised its quarterly dividend earlier in the year. The stock has climbed more than 125% over the trailing twelve months and recently attracted an upgraded price target from a major bank, though at least one firm has trimmed its rating amid valuation and cyclicality considerations.

Trending AI Robots

For investors who prefer a systematic approach to evaluating names like DINO and VLO, Tickeron offers a curated selection of algorithmic trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, timeframe, performance statistics, and set of covered securities. Because not every bot suits every market regime, only the best and most suitable for current conditions earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to review the strategies currently demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Although both companies operate in the same industry, their market positioning differs in meaningful ways. Valero's scale and Gulf Coast concentration give it broad feedstock flexibility and deeper exposure to export-oriented demand, while HF Sinclair's smaller, regionally focused footprint offers a different earnings profile tied to the Mid-Continent and Western markets.

On diversification, both have expanded beyond conventional refining. HF Sinclair's Lubricants & Specialties and Midstream segments provide some earnings stability and a near-term catalyst in the planned separation. Valero, by contrast, derives additional earnings engines from renewable diesel and ethanol, both of which improved sharply in recent quarters. In terms of valuation, HF Sinclair trades at a lower enterprise value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple than Valero, reflecting differences in scale, liquidity, and balance-sheet strength; Valero holds a larger cash position and a lower net debt-to-capitalization ratio.

The primary risk factors are shared: both are highly sensitive to refining margins, crude price volatility, and demand trends, and both face cyclical earnings — consensus estimates imply a notable step-down in profitability after the current year. HF Sinclair additionally carries governance uncertainty following executive leaves of absence, while Valero faces exposure to renewable credit values and higher maintenance spending after a recent refinery fire.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor VLO in the current environment, though the distinction is modest. Valero's larger scale, Gulf Coast feedstock advantages, cleaner balance sheet, and multiple earnings engines provide relatively greater trend consistency and stability. That said, DINO presents a compelling catalyst in its planned lubricants separation and trades at a comparatively lower valuation. The appropriate choice depends on whether an investor prioritizes scale and diversification or a specific restructuring catalyst and value multiple. A probabilistic, data-driven framework would likely assign a slight edge to Valero while acknowledging that both names remain strong performers within a supportive refining cycle.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DINO vs. VLO commentary
Oct 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DINO is a Hold and VLO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DINO vs VLO: Fundamental Ratings
DINO
VLO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8192
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
122
SMR RATING
1..100
4834
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9699
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DINO's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as VLO (73) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that DINO’s stock grew similarly to VLO’s over the last 12 months.

VLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DINO (12) in the null industry. This means that VLO’s stock grew similarly to DINO’s over the last 12 months.

VLO's SMR Rating (34) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DINO (48) in the null industry. This means that VLO’s stock grew similarly to DINO’s over the last 12 months.

VLO's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DINO (35) in the null industry. This means that VLO’s stock grew similarly to DINO’s over the last 12 months.

DINO's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as VLO (99) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that DINO’s stock grew similarly to VLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINOVLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2026
Stock price -- (DINO: $114.60 vs. VLO: $419.22)
Brand notoriety: DINO: Not notable vs. VLO: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DINO: 61% vs. VLO: 60%
Market capitalization -- DINO: $18.88B vs. VLO: $112.17B
DINO [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $18.88B. VLO’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $112.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $23.08K to $112.17B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $22.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DINO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while VLO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DINO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DINO is a better buy in the long-term than VLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DINO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DINO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLO is a better buy in the short-term than DINO.

Price Growth

DINO (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +8.53% price change this week, while VLO (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +8.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +5.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

DINO is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

VLO is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+5.00% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

View a ticker or compare two or three
DINO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CENTA34.610.35
+1.02%
Central Garden & Pet Company
GSAT83.630.09
+0.11%
Globalstar Inc
RSSS2.04-0.05
-2.39%
Research Solutions
ENTX2.53-0.09
-3.44%
Entera Bio Ltd
GNPX2.61-0.11
-4.04%
Genprex Inc

DINO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DINO has been closely correlated with MPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DINO jumps, then MPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DINO
1D Price
Change %
DINO100%
-0.54%
MPC - DINO
80%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
VLO - DINO
79%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
PBF - DINO
77%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
DK - DINO
76%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
PSX - DINO
75%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
More

VLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VLO has been closely correlated with MPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VLO jumps, then MPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLO
1D Price
Change %
VLO100%
-0.03%
MPC - VLO
87%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
PSX - VLO
84%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
DINO - VLO
79%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
PBF - VLO
78%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
DK - VLO
73%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
More