Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DISAX vs RERBX
DISAX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts DISAX vs RERBX
BNY Mellon International Stock Fund A
Price$23.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.42B
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$57.41
Change+$0.18 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.45B
DISAX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DISAX vs. RERBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DISAX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. DISAX (5.42B). DISAX pays higher dividends than RERBX: DISAX (0.52) vs RERBX (0.45). DISAX was incepted earlier than RERBX: DISAX (18 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than DISAX (1.24). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. DISAX (12.30). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DISAX: RERBX (250) vs DISAX (1000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.84 vs. DISAX (-6.23). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.32 vs. DISAX (13.39).
| DISAX | RERBX | DISAX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.56 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.56 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.293 | 12.901 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.42B | 133B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.45 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.23 | 1.84 | -339% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.27 | 14.52 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.39 | 14.32 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.23 | 20.69 | 277% |