Ad is loading...
DISCX vs RERBX
DISCX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts DISCX vs RERBX
BNY Mellon International Stock Fund C
Price$22.03
Change+$0.41 (+1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.22B
American Funds Europacific Growth R2
Price$52.58
Change+$0.62 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.11B
DISCX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DISCX vs. RERBX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DISCX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. DISCX (5.23B). RERBX pays higher dividends than DISCX: RERBX (0.48) vs DISCX (0.00). DISCX was incepted earlier than RERBX: DISCX (18 years) vs RERBX (23 years). DISCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. DISCX (12.30). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DISCX: RERBX (250) vs DISCX (1000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.89 vs. DISCX (-7.18). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.64 vs. DISCX (16.13).
| DISCX | RERBX | DISCX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.56 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.56 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.226 | 3.402 | -65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.23B | 123B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.18 | -2.89 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.27 | 5.24 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.13 | 22.64 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.05 | 6.44 | 591% |