Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DISCX vs RERBX
DISCX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts DISCX vs RERBX
BNY Mellon International Stock Fund C
Price$23.48
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.87B
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.83
Change+$0.49 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.54B
DISCX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DISCX vs. RERBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DISCX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. DISCX (4.87B). RERBX pays higher dividends than DISCX: RERBX (0.24) vs DISCX (0.00). DISCX was incepted earlier than RERBX: DISCX (19 years) vs RERBX (23 years). DISCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. DISCX (12.30). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DISCX: RERBX (250) vs DISCX (1000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.25 vs. DISCX (-4.13). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.41 vs. DISCX (4.50).
| DISCX | RERBX | DISCX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.56 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.56 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.542 | 21.593 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.87B | 138B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.13 | 10.25 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.64 | 47.60 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.50 | 9.41 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.75 | 37.49 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement