DIT
Price
$112.95
Change
+$1.95 (+1.76%)
Updated
Jul 18, 12:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
115.99M
MTTWF
Price
$6.10
Change
+$0.65 (+11.93%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
3.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIT vs MTTWF

Header iconDIT vs MTTWF Comparison
Open Charts DIT vs MTTWFBanner chart's image
AMCON Distributing
Price$112.95
Change+$1.95 (+1.76%)
Volume$40
Capitalization115.99M
METRO AG
Price$6.10
Change+$0.65 (+11.93%)
Volume$1.14K
Capitalization3.16B
DIT vs MTTWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DIT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIT vs. MTTWF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIT is a Hold and MTTWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (DIT: $111.00 vs. MTTWF: $6.10)
Brand notoriety: DIT and MTTWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIT: 25% vs. MTTWF: 100%
Market capitalization -- DIT: $115.99M vs. MTTWF: $3.16B
DIT [@Food Distributors] is valued at $115.99M. MTTWF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $3.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTTWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DIT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTTWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIT is a better buy in the long-term than MTTWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DIT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

DIT (@Food Distributors) experienced а -5.81% price change this week, while MTTWF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +148.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIT is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-0.05% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTTWF($3.16B) has a higher market cap than DIT($116M). MTTWF has higher P/E ratio than DIT: MTTWF (15.15) vs DIT (10.55). MTTWF YTD gains are higher at: 14.662 vs. DIT (-13.153). MTTWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.43B vs. DIT (33.1M). MTTWF has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. DIT (997K). DIT has less debt than MTTWF: DIT (177M) vs MTTWF (4.13B). MTTWF has higher revenues than DIT: MTTWF (30.9B) vs DIT (2.62B).
DITMTTWFDIT / MTTWF
Capitalization116M3.16B4%
EBITDA33.1M1.43B2%
Gain YTD-13.15314.662-90%
P/E Ratio10.5515.1570%
Revenue2.62B30.9B8%
Total Cash997K1.03B0%
Total Debt177M4.13B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIT vs MTTWF: Fundamental Ratings
DIT
MTTWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2644
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
8893
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
299
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTTWF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIT (40) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that MTTWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIT’s over the last 12 months.

DIT's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTTWF (100) in the null industry. This means that DIT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

DIT's SMR Rating (88) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as MTTWF (93) in the null industry. This means that DIT’s stock grew similarly to MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

MTTWF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as DIT (53) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that MTTWF’s stock grew similarly to DIT’s over the last 12 months.

DIT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTTWF (99) in the null industry. This means that DIT’s stock grew significantly faster than MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DITMTTWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY628.043.82
+0.61%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X119289.840000551.343750
+0.46%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL210.02-0.14
-0.07%
Apple
TSLA319.41-2.26
-0.70%
Tesla
GME23.40-0.28
-1.18%
GameStop Corp

MTTWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTTWF and DIT have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTTWF and DIT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTTWF
1D Price
Change %
MTTWF100%
N/A
DIT - MTTWF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.01%
CHEF - MTTWF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
SYY - MTTWF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
CVGW - MTTWF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
UNFI - MTTWF
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.23%
More