DLB
Price
$71.26
Change
-$0.25 (-0.35%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.83B
39 days until earnings call
FA
Price
$15.76
Change
+$0.55 (+3.62%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.74B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DLB vs FA

Header iconDLB vs FA Comparison
Open Charts DLB vs FABanner chart's image
Dolby Laboratories
Price$71.26
Change-$0.25 (-0.35%)
Volume$408.64K
Capitalization6.83B
First Advantage
Price$15.76
Change+$0.55 (+3.62%)
Volume$611.06K
Capitalization2.74B
DLB vs FA Comparison Chart in %
DLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DLB vs. FA commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLB is a StrongBuy and FA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DLB: $71.26 vs. FA: $15.76)
Brand notoriety: DLB and FA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DLB: 84% vs. FA: 74%
Market capitalization -- DLB: $6.83B vs. FA: $2.74B
DLB [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $6.83B. FA’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $2.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FA is a better buy in the long-term than DLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DLB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DLB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FA is a better buy in the short-term than DLB.

Price Growth

DLB (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -1.56% price change this week, while FA (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +2.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

DLB is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

FA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (+2.17% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DLB($6.83B) has a higher market cap than FA($2.74B). FA has higher P/E ratio than DLB: FA (619.33) vs DLB (26.39). DLB YTD gains are higher at: -7.585 vs. FA (-15.857). DLB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 388M vs. FA (183M). DLB has more cash in the bank: 699M vs. FA (184M). DLB has less debt than FA: DLB (39.1M) vs FA (2.14B). DLB has higher revenues than FA: DLB (1.35B) vs FA (1.25B).
DLBFADLB / FA
Capitalization6.83B2.74B249%
EBITDA388M183M212%
Gain YTD-7.585-15.85748%
P/E Ratio26.39619.334%
Revenue1.35B1.25B108%
Total Cash699M184M380%
Total Debt39.1M2.14B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DLB: Fundamental Ratings
DLB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
69
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DLBFA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGGBX2.840.01
+0.35%
Templeton Global Dynamic Income R6
JGQYX18.780.06
+0.32%
Jensen Global Quality Growth Y
FCGAX154.740.30
+0.19%
Franklin Growth Adv
GGKPX27.640.04
+0.14%
Goldman Sachs Income Builder P
WDSCX18.52-0.05
-0.27%
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl C

DLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DLB has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DLB jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DLB
1D Price
Change %
DLB100%
-0.35%
EXPO - DLB
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
MSA - DLB
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
ARMK - DLB
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
FA - DLB
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.62%
AZZ - DLB
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
More

FA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FA has been loosely correlated with BCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FA jumps, then BCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FA
1D Price
Change %
FA100%
+3.62%
BCO - FA
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
BRC - FA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
MSA - FA
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
DLB - FA
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
MMS - FA
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.01%
More