Ad is loading...
DLHAX vs FSPHX
DLHAX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHAX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHAX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. DLHAX (642M). DLHAX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: DLHAX (0.10) vs FSPHX (0.02). DLHAX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: DLHAX (18 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). DLHAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. DLHAX (5.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHAX: FSPHX (0) vs DLHAX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.31 vs. DLHAX (-13.38). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -7.06 vs. DLHAX (-11.51).
| DLHAX | FSPHX | DLHAX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.65 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.65 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.768 | -5.798 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 642M | 6.42B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.02 | 584% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.38 | -8.31 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.82 | -9.31 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.51 | -7.06 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.32 | 8.14 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers