Ad is loading...
DLHCX vs FBTAX
DLHCX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FBTAX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Hold and FBTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.37B vs. DLHCX (655M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than DLHCX: FBTAX (2.96) vs DLHCX (0.00). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: DLHCX (15 years) vs FBTAX (24 years). DLHCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. DLHCX (5.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FBTAX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.94 vs. DLHCX (-18.15). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : -11.35 vs. DLHCX (-19.69).
| DLHCX | FBTAX | DLHCX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.96 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.96 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.766 | -9.739 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 655M | 1.37B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.96 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.15 | -13.94 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.12 | 30.95 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.69 | -11.35 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.27 | -9.32 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...