Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLHCX vs FBTAX
DLHCX vs FBTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLHCX vs. FBTAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLHCX is a Buy and FBTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. DLHCX (662M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than DLHCX: FBTAX (2.59) vs DLHCX (0.00). DLHCX was incepted earlier than FBTAX: DLHCX (16 years) vs FBTAX (25 years). DLHCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. DLHCX (5.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLHCX: FBTAX (0) vs DLHCX (1000). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.83 vs. DLHCX (-16.89). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.91 vs. DLHCX (-12.71).
| DLHCX | FBTAX | DLHCX / FBTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.96 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.96 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.100 | 12.863 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 662M | 1.46B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.89 | -3.83 | 441% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.73 | 35.90 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.71 | 6.91 | -184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.47 | 10.51 | 138% |