Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLLDX vs PFGAX
DLLDX vs PFGAX Comparison
Open Charts DLLDX vs PFGAX
DoubleLine Long Duration Total Ret Bd N
Price$6.40
Change-$0.03 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.34M
PIMCO Long-Term US Government A
Price$14.29
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets792.44M
DLLDX vs PFGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLLDX vs. PFGAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLLDX is a Hold and PFGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFGAX has more cash in the bank: 792M vs. DLLDX (55.3M). DLLDX pays higher dividends than PFGAX: DLLDX (4.83) vs PFGAX (3.38). DLLDX was incepted earlier than PFGAX: DLLDX (11 years) vs PFGAX (29 years). PFGAX (4.00) is less costly to investors than DLLDX (1.02). PFGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. DLLDX (86.00). PFGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLLDX: PFGAX (1000) vs DLLDX (2000). PFGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.00 vs. DLLDX (-4.39). DLLDX return over 5 years is better than : -35.02 vs. PFGAX (-48.01).
| DLLDX | PFGAX | DLLDX / PFGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 4.00 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 4.00 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.262 | 7.081 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.3M | 792M | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.83 | 3.38 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.39 | -4.00 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.37 | -1.45 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.02 | -48.01 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.12 | -57.56 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement