Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DLLDX vs PFGAX
DLLDX vs PFGAX Comparison
Open Charts DLLDX vs PFGAX
DoubleLine Long Duration Total Ret Bd N
Price$6.12
Change-$0.08 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.39M
PIMCO Long-Term US Government A
Price$13.58
Change-$0.18 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets740.19M
DLLDX vs PFGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DLLDX vs. PFGAX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLLDX is a Hold and PFGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFGAX has more cash in the bank: 740M vs. DLLDX (52.4M). DLLDX pays higher dividends than PFGAX: DLLDX (4.77) vs PFGAX (3.23). DLLDX was incepted earlier than PFGAX: DLLDX (11 years) vs PFGAX (28 years). PFGAX (2.21) is less costly to investors than DLLDX (0.92). DLLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 146.00 vs. PFGAX (138.00). PFGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DLLDX: PFGAX (1000) vs DLLDX (2000). DLLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.69 vs. PFGAX (-1.22). DLLDX return over 5 years is better than : -38.64 vs. PFGAX (-51.02).
| DLLDX | PFGAX | DLLDX / PFGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 2.21 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.21 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.563 | 2.334 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.4M | 740M | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.77 | 3.23 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.69 | -1.22 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.80 | -11.73 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.64 | -51.02 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.24 | -57.48 | 23% |