Advertisement
DLMAF vs DQJCY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLMAF is a StrongBuy and DQJCY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DLMAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileDQJCY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DLMAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- DQJCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DLMAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DQJCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DLMAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- DQJCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DLMAF (@Discount Stores) experienced а +0.79% price change this week, while DQJCY (@Discount Stores) price change was -5.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.78%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Discount Stores (+1.81% weekly)Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
| DLMAF | DQJCY | DLMAF / DQJCY | |
| Capitalization | 37.6B | 20.7B | 182% |
| EBITDA | 2.28B | 197B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | 42.212 | 26.196 | 161% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.91 | 33.50 | 125% |
| Revenue | 6.69B | 2.18T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 687M | 203B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 5.56B | 487B | 1% |
DLMAF | DQJCY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DLMAF's Valuation (93) in the null industry is in the same range as DQJCY (93). This means that DLMAF’s stock grew similarly to DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.
DLMAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DQJCY (50). This means that DLMAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.
DLMAF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DQJCY (100). This means that DLMAF’s stock grew significantly faster than DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.
DLMAF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as DQJCY (49). This means that DLMAF’s stock grew similarly to DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.
DQJCY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as DLMAF (27). This means that DQJCY’s stock grew similarly to DLMAF’s over the last 12 months.
| DLMAF | DQJCY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 57% | 11 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 42% | 1 day ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MOTI | 37.73 | 0.18 | +0.49% |
| VanEck Morningstar Intl Moat ETF | |||
| QEMM | 67.23 | 0.32 | +0.47% |
| SPDR® MSCI Emerging Mkts StratcFacts ETF | |||
| SPYV | 54.82 | 0.19 | +0.35% |
| SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | |||
| XMLV | 63.29 | 0.17 | +0.27% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | |||
| EMOT | 23.91 | N/A | -0.02% |
| First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF | |||
DLMAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DLMAF and OLLI have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLMAF and OLLI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DLMAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLMAF | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| OLLI - DLMAF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
| COST - DLMAF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| WMT - DLMAF | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| BMRRY - DLMAF | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.03% | ||
| WMMVY - DLMAF | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||
DQJCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DQJCY and BMRRY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DQJCY and BMRRY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DQJCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DQJCY | 100% | -1.76% | ||
| BMRRY - DQJCY | 18% Poorly correlated | +2.03% | ||
| WMMVY - DQJCY | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| WMMVF - DQJCY | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| DLMAF - DQJCY | -0% Poorly correlated | +0.87% |