DLMAF
Price
$107.34
Change
+$0.34 (+0.32%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
31.06B
DQJCY
Price
$27.71
Change
+$0.24 (+0.87%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
16.31B
Ad is loading...

DLMAF vs DQJCY

Header iconDLMAF vs DQJCY Comparison
Open Charts DLMAF vs DQJCYBanner chart's image
Dollarama
Price$107.34
Change+$0.34 (+0.32%)
Volume$1.63K
Capitalization31.06B
Pan Pac
Price$27.71
Change+$0.24 (+0.87%)
Volume$26.05K
Capitalization16.31B
DLMAF vs DQJCY Comparison Chart
Loading...
DQJCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DLMAF vs. DQJCY commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DLMAF is a Hold and DQJCY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (DLMAF: $107.34 vs. DQJCY: $27.72)
Brand notoriety: DLMAF and DQJCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DLMAF: 50% vs. DQJCY: 99%
Market capitalization -- DLMAF: $31.06B vs. DQJCY: $16.31B
DLMAF [@Discount Stores] is valued at $31.06B. DQJCY’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $16.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $719.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $87.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DLMAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileDQJCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DLMAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • DQJCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DLMAF is a better buy in the long-term than DQJCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DQJCY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DQJCY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

DLMAF (@Discount Stores) experienced а +1.40% price change this week, while DQJCY (@Discount Stores) price change was +0.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +3.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (+3.19% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DLMAF($31.1B) has a higher market cap than DQJCY($16.3B). DLMAF has higher P/E ratio than DQJCY: DLMAF (40.87) vs DQJCY (25.96). DLMAF YTD gains are higher at: 11.245 vs. DQJCY (1.968). DQJCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 197B vs. DLMAF (2.04B). DQJCY has more cash in the bank: 203B vs. DLMAF (283M). DLMAF has less debt than DQJCY: DLMAF (4.66B) vs DQJCY (487B). DQJCY has higher revenues than DLMAF: DQJCY (2.18T) vs DLMAF (6.17B).
DLMAFDQJCYDLMAF / DQJCY
Capitalization31.1B16.3B191%
EBITDA2.04B197B1%
Gain YTD11.2451.968571%
P/E Ratio40.8725.96157%
Revenue6.17B2.18T0%
Total Cash283M203B0%
Total Debt4.66B487B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DLMAF vs DQJCY: Fundamental Ratings
DLMAF
DQJCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2078
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
240
SMR RATING
1..100
12100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2259
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DLMAF's Valuation (92) in the null industry is in the same range as DQJCY (94). This means that DLMAF’s stock grew similarly to DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.

DLMAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DQJCY (40). This means that DLMAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.

DLMAF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DQJCY (100). This means that DLMAF’s stock grew significantly faster than DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.

DLMAF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as DQJCY (48). This means that DLMAF’s stock grew similarly to DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.

DLMAF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DQJCY (59). This means that DLMAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DQJCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DQJCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DQJCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMRGX9.890.02
+0.20%
Calamos Merger Arbitrage I
WFPDX10.24N/A
N/A
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr Adm
AFCGX17.08N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Intl Gr G
DIGGX86.71N/A
N/A
Invesco Discovery R5
LAIDX8.76N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Value I

DLMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DLMAF and OLLI have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLMAF and OLLI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DLMAF
1D Price
Change %
DLMAF100%
+0.32%
OLLI - DLMAF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
COST - DLMAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
WMT - DLMAF
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
BMRRY - DLMAF
15%
Poorly correlated
+4.63%
WMMVY - DLMAF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
More

DQJCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DQJCY and BMRRY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DQJCY and BMRRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DQJCY
1D Price
Change %
DQJCY100%
+0.86%
BMRRY - DQJCY
18%
Poorly correlated
+4.63%
WMMVY - DQJCY
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
WMMVF - DQJCY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLMAF - DQJCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%